An Italian Hostage Speaks
... and the message is horrible.
""I said it before the kidnapping and I repeat it today," she told Corriere della Sera newspaper in an interview published Friday.
"You have to distinguish between terrorism and resistance. The guerrilla war is justified, but I am against the kidnapping of civilians." "
Right now the two are almost indistinguishable considered that they used roadside bombs not to kidnap civilians but to blow them up while training to be policemen to keep Iraqis safe, these people knew they could not win against the American Military in a real fight so now they do it in a way to wear down our will. And you, my dear, are a useful idiot.
Describing the administration of Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi as "a puppet government in the hands of the Americans," Torretta said elections planned for January would have no legitimacy: "During my days in detention ... I came to the conclusion it will take decades to put Iraq back on its feet."
That is quite a conclusion to make when you're being held against you will with no contact to the outside world. Yes, your opinion on this subject should be considered expert...
"... I believe that (the kidnappers) were a very political, religious group and that in the end they were convinced that we were not enemies."
Political? Ba'athist. Religious? Fundamental Islamic Terror is the religion. Of course they came to the conclusion you were not the enemy - TODAY. No, today you are the useful idiot who can go give validity for the situation in Iraq for them. For the sake of western civilization, it appears releasing you might have been a mistake because the words you say are not true, and they give aid to the enemy who wants to kill Iraqis who do not want an Islamic Fundamentalist State (the people you want to help, no?), and the want to kill Coalition Troops - something you do not care about.
Not being the enemy of Fundamental Islamic Terror is something you should not be so willing to label yourself, but it is obvious that not everyone thinks this. Indeed not.
""I said it before the kidnapping and I repeat it today," she told Corriere della Sera newspaper in an interview published Friday.
"You have to distinguish between terrorism and resistance. The guerrilla war is justified, but I am against the kidnapping of civilians." "
Right now the two are almost indistinguishable considered that they used roadside bombs not to kidnap civilians but to blow them up while training to be policemen to keep Iraqis safe, these people knew they could not win against the American Military in a real fight so now they do it in a way to wear down our will. And you, my dear, are a useful idiot.
Describing the administration of Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi as "a puppet government in the hands of the Americans," Torretta said elections planned for January would have no legitimacy: "During my days in detention ... I came to the conclusion it will take decades to put Iraq back on its feet."
That is quite a conclusion to make when you're being held against you will with no contact to the outside world. Yes, your opinion on this subject should be considered expert...
"... I believe that (the kidnappers) were a very political, religious group and that in the end they were convinced that we were not enemies."
Political? Ba'athist. Religious? Fundamental Islamic Terror is the religion. Of course they came to the conclusion you were not the enemy - TODAY. No, today you are the useful idiot who can go give validity for the situation in Iraq for them. For the sake of western civilization, it appears releasing you might have been a mistake because the words you say are not true, and they give aid to the enemy who wants to kill Iraqis who do not want an Islamic Fundamentalist State (the people you want to help, no?), and the want to kill Coalition Troops - something you do not care about.
Not being the enemy of Fundamental Islamic Terror is something you should not be so willing to label yourself, but it is obvious that not everyone thinks this. Indeed not.
<< Home