Kerry: More Help or More Harm?
The Washington Post seems to think that when conservatives get upset about Kerry's remarks over Iraq, and his wonderful wife's comments hinting about bin Laden, that is 'rhetoric'. Dana Milbank's article is headlined with, "Tying Kerry to Terror Tests Rhetorical Limits".
So what exactly are some of the things Kerry has said to make people think that? As stated earlier, he's said that al Sadr was a legitimate, or sort of legitimate voice in Iraq when he decided it was the right thing to be critical of Iraq and Coalition policy that removed his newspaper (which was used to promote and organize violence) from publication.
The most telling sign that Kerry does not understand that what he says about Iraq is, if not emboldening the enemy, it is not making life for our Soldiers easier. Check this out:
The words written behind this 'misunderstood' figure say, "No More Bush".
Kerry also likes to say, "They're charging 17 percent more for Medicare while making America pay $200 billion for a go-it-alone policy in Iraq. That's the wrong choice; that's the wrong direction; and that's the wrong leadership for America."
Of course, it has been mentioned that 17% of all the coalition are not the U.S., but go it alone still seems to be his response. Either he is willing to snub and mock our allies, or he is completely uninformed as to what is actually going on in Iraq. Either case is a bad case for someone who wants to be President.
Does talk like his embolden?
Terrorists thought so in Spain where a cowardly attack lead to Spain pulling forces out of Iraq. It is true that the election was a close one, but after the attack people decided to grant the terrorists their wishes. Is that considered emboldening?
Kerry talks of sagging troop morale, but just as with Vietnam, Kerry is a source of negative attacks and comments when he uses words like quagmire , failure, and all the rest that add up to saying that our troops are in fact dying for everything groups like ANSWER say they are - things like oil, US Imperialism, and of course many leftists say our troops are dying for nothing at all.
Has Kerry ever said anything positive about U.S. Troops and not taken those statements back? EVER?
The Democratic Party picked a horrible candidate and it shows.
Take another look at the image and you will see why we need FOUR MORE YEARS.
So what exactly are some of the things Kerry has said to make people think that? As stated earlier, he's said that al Sadr was a legitimate, or sort of legitimate voice in Iraq when he decided it was the right thing to be critical of Iraq and Coalition policy that removed his newspaper (which was used to promote and organize violence) from publication.
The most telling sign that Kerry does not understand that what he says about Iraq is, if not emboldening the enemy, it is not making life for our Soldiers easier. Check this out:
The words written behind this 'misunderstood' figure say, "No More Bush".
Kerry also likes to say, "They're charging 17 percent more for Medicare while making America pay $200 billion for a go-it-alone policy in Iraq. That's the wrong choice; that's the wrong direction; and that's the wrong leadership for America."
Of course, it has been mentioned that 17% of all the coalition are not the U.S., but go it alone still seems to be his response. Either he is willing to snub and mock our allies, or he is completely uninformed as to what is actually going on in Iraq. Either case is a bad case for someone who wants to be President.
Does talk like his embolden?
Terrorists thought so in Spain where a cowardly attack lead to Spain pulling forces out of Iraq. It is true that the election was a close one, but after the attack people decided to grant the terrorists their wishes. Is that considered emboldening?
Kerry talks of sagging troop morale, but just as with Vietnam, Kerry is a source of negative attacks and comments when he uses words like quagmire , failure, and all the rest that add up to saying that our troops are in fact dying for everything groups like ANSWER say they are - things like oil, US Imperialism, and of course many leftists say our troops are dying for nothing at all.
Has Kerry ever said anything positive about U.S. Troops and not taken those statements back? EVER?
The Democratic Party picked a horrible candidate and it shows.
Take another look at the image and you will see why we need FOUR MORE YEARS.
posted by Edward W. Prather at 08:42
<< Home